By Gerald Holland
The Wall Street Journal continues to peddle the fable that vote fraud is rare, therefore not worth we of the gullible public worrying our comfortable little heads over. If the subject is general vote fraud, the Journal casts a wide security blanket over all that possibility. When the fraud alert is confined to mail balloting, the Journal confines its security assurance to cover only mail balloting.
If Brookings, as cited in the Journal, could find only a handful of instances of vote fraud, maybe Brookings didn’t want to find it. Ballot fraud has been defined down, as California does when their officialdom declares that thefts below $900 aren’t prosecutable crimes, therefore crime ls legalized. When ballot-harvester con artists collect ballots from trusting citizens whom they have “aided” to complete their ballots, that is fraud. When ballot harvesters dump bushels of ballots into counting systems days after an election, that is fraud. When dozens or hundreds of ballots are submitted, all bearing the same residence address, that is fraud. When nursing home staffs prepare and turn in ballots for patients suffering dementia, that is fraud. When ballots are “found” in car trunks days after elections, that is fraud. When judges order imprisoned felons’ surprisingly-discovered ballots to be counted that is fraud. When vote recounting has to continue until enough “votes” are found to give the Democrat a win, that is fraud. All these have happened and will continue to happen as long as Democrats benefit from the fraudulent activity.
The Journal helps uncover fraud in many endeavors. Why does the WSJ think that voting is so precious and sacred that few people would do it? Winning elections by any means necessary is a path to great piles of riches without having to produce anything of value.